Your Body: the Land
Public Lands: Preservation vs. Recreation
by Scott C. Reuman
HOME
MORE WRITING
Public land is under an ever-increasing squeeze from all directions.
The land is needed and used for wood and mineral products, wildlife habitat,
and recreation. The last, recreation, is the newest pressure.
Recreational use of public lands has increased 130% over a decade earlier,
and a doubling of many outdoor recreational activities is anticipated by
2020. Can recreation coexist with commodities extraction and preservation?
I am an organism, as is each
of you, made of some 1014 cells (that's
100,000 billion). These cells are being replaced at the rate of 25 million
each second, all with nearly perfect coordination and interconnectedness.
All cells know precisely what to do, but are utterly unable to do so without
1014 cooperative interrelationships.
Each cell requires energy, and each must rid itself of waste. Each
cell takes in messages, chemical and electrical, perhaps emotional and spiritual
as well, and sends out an equal number of responses. As an organism,
you and I are very very impressive.
Each recognized species is also a similarly
impressive organism. There are 10 to perhaps 100 million species on the planet.
Each is dependent on others and on a system of energy delivery and waste removal,
consumption and production. Even single-celled organisms have uncountable
chemical reactions within their internal environment, and uncountable external
interrelationships, both chemical and sensory, with their surrounding environment.
Now, consider the concept that a piece
of land is also an organism. It is an organism little different and
not separate from you or me. This idea is generally in opposition to
what we learn early in our life: that each of our neatly packaged and
very intelligent human organisms is a separate entity, a separate being.
But this packaged organic body of yours is a system that works only in concert
with an infinite number of internal and external relationships with other
systems. These systems can be living or non-living, organic or inorganic.
These systems produce and consume food or energy. Some produce oxygen,
some carbon dioxide. Some systems take care of our wastes. Some
clean our water and air. But they are all indispensable. Take
one away, and you may disappear, too.
We do not really have a thorough understanding
of the complexity of our bodies, our personal organism. It is easy to
imagine, then, our lack of understanding of the land-as-organism. It
is even more complex because it involves many organisms all intersecting,
all interrelating, all producing and consuming, cleaning and excreting,
breathing and eating. The only thing missing to this land-as-organism
is skin. Skin to define its boundaries.
The land does not boast a consciousness
with which we can communicate in English. But inherent to the land
are continuous innumerable complex interrelationships within and between
the organisms present, just as between the cells in your body.
Now consider the land-as-organism without
life, only rocks and the elements. On this inorganic land there remains
a system of interdependent processes just as in your skin-covered organism.
We call these processes by physical names such as erosion, mountain building,
exfoliation, adsorption, freeze expansion, and so forth. This system
of interrelationships exists and functions just the same as in any living
organism. Processes depend on other processes. Systems depend
on other systems. Weather erodes rock into sediment which may filter
water for a while before it gathers into sedimentary rock which may compress
into metamorphic rock, and then crystallize into valuable minerals or erode
back to sediment.
We now have three levels of organisms:
the living creatures (you, me, and all those other recognized species),
the organic land teeming with life and all their interconnections, and third,
the land itself, an inorganic relation of things only. This last serves
humans and all other organisms as the medium in which our interconnections
take place. It gives us a place to stand in an otherwise largely evacuated
universe.
There is a fourth level, a more "cosmic"
level if you will, in which all these interconnections could be reduced or
translated into exchanges of energy only. That energy connects each
of us with every other species and with every piece of land and with every
piece of star in the universe. But, let's leave this fourth level for
a later discussion.
The big leap that I'd like you to make
with me is hard for some people to accept, harder to comprehend on a truly
visceral level. Put very simply, the land is us and we are the land.
We breathe, the trees breathe -- we exchange gases. Without one another,
we would both die. We excrete, bacteria clean up after us. To
us its waste, to the bacteria its life-giving food. Without one another
we would both die. We drink water that the land provides to us reasonably
clean, and we return it, though not always in the same appetizing form.
The land is not separate from us. It is us and we are it. There
is missing only skin to envelop us and the land and define this union as a
discrete organism that fits neatly into our taxonomy texts. We could
think of the planet's boundaries as that skin, but it, too, exchanges energy
and material, experiencing gains and losses. We are only one small cell
and the land is just another small cell on this planet, and we work together
in this infinite interrelationship of processes.
Consider for a moment what happens
if we mistreat our own organism, our body: a cut bleeds, a blow to
the head hurts. Smoking probably causes cancer. Couch potatoes
gather moss. We can expect to suffer consequences from this bodily
mistreatment. Sometimes, we heal from this abuse. Sometimes a
scar remains. Sometimes we do not heal, we are permanently disabled.
Sometimes we die.
We try to compensate with exercise,
good food, and fun times, keeping all those 1014 cells
happy and well fed.
An organism of land is no different.
Cut it and it will bleed. It may heal, may scar, or may be permanently
disabled. It may require time and therapy to recover. Deal it
a severe enough blow and it may die.
How do you treat your body, the organism
that's covered with skin? Do you feed it toxins? Do you slash
it with a sharp knife? Do you weaken its immune system? Or, do
you treat it well, care for it with exercise and gentleness?
How do you treat your body the land?
Do you cut paths across it without concern for healing or scars? Do
you consider how the land is feeding you when you ride or hike or build a
new trail? Do you excise an organ or two because you don't understand
their function or because they are in the way?
If you fill in a wetland, you fill in a liver,
and you fill in your clean water. If you cut a trail, you cut your body's
skin. If the cut is bad, a scar forms. If the cut is re-injured,
it continues to bleed. If you desiccate your streams or fill your arteries
with sediment, you thicken your blood, you clog your arteries.
If you separate your body-the-land
into small parcels, place a heart over in one corner of the room and place
a pancreas over in another, a muscle up by the ceiling and bone down on the
floor, the interrelationships that make us a functioning, healthy organism
become harder, if not impossible, to maintain.
If you cut a road or trail through
a forest fragmenting the ecosystem, you leave some "organs" on one side of
the road and some on the other. Their ability to relate and survive
is impaired. The effects of fragmentation are very well documented
in the scientific literature of our time.
We ask of the land to clean our air
and water for us. We ask it to feed us, physically and emotionally.
We ask it to nurture us, not like a mother, nor as a separate entity.
"Mother Earth" we call it, that time-honored metaphor, but this is inappropriate.
Instead, the land is no different, not even separate from us. If we
ask something of the land, we must ask what we can give in return.
At the very least, we must be aware that we are part of the infinite interrelationships
that take place with or without our conscious input, with or without our
understanding. Can the land speak our language? No. Perhaps
it time for us to become multilingual and learn to speak its language.
BACK TO TOP
|